Automated QA Testing Services

Pricing depends on how many user journeys are in scope, how complex your CI/CD setup is, and whether cross-browser or mobile coverage is included. Framework setup with an initial suite is priced lower than a legacy refactor with a full audit attached, and ongoing maintenance is scoped separately by release frequency. Every engagement is quoted as a fixed price with defined deliverables before work begins, so there are no surprises once the suite is live.

A stable suite covering your critical user journeys typically takes four to eight weeks. A broader suite adding secondary flows, cross-browser and API coverage usually runs eight to fourteen weeks. Timeline depends on application complexity and environment stability, but you see working tests from week one, not at the end of the engagement.

Automated testing runs predefined checks on every build and is strongest for regression coverage on stable functionality. Manual testing brings human judgment, best for exploratory work, UX assessment and edge cases that are hard to script. The two work best together: automation handles the repeatable regression work, manual testing covers the judgment layer. We offer both and will tell you honestly which mix fits your situation.

Yes, and starting from zero is common. We begin with a coverage audit mapping critical user journeys and the highest-risk flows to automate first. Framework setup and suite development follow, prioritising the flows that protect the most business value, so you have stable coverage on critical paths before we move to anything secondary.

We integrate directly with GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI, Jenkins or whatever you already run. Tests trigger on commits to agreed branches, with failure thresholds that block deployment when critical tests fail, and notifications routed to Slack or email. This is built during framework setup, not added on afterwards, so tests are validating real commits from week one.

Flaky tests get caught during the stability run, before the suite is signed off. We fix the root cause, timing issues, race conditions, unstable selectors, rather than papering over it with retry logic. Anything that cannot be made reliably stable gets quarantined and documented, and ongoing maintenance includes flakiness monitoring as standard.

Every failure includes the test name, the assertion that failed, the step it occurred at, a screenshot at the point of failure, and relevant console or network log output. A developer can reproduce it locally without a recording or a follow-up call. Summary reports show pass and fail rates by suite, failure trends across recent builds, and the coverage map.

Automated DAST tools and dependency vulnerability checks integrated into your pipeline catch known vulnerability patterns on every build, OWASP-classified issues, outdated dependencies with known CVEs, insecure configurations. That is not a substitute for a manual penetration test, which catches business logic flaws no scanner will find. We offer both as part of our QA practice.

Yes. We build mobile automation using Appium for cross-platform coverage and Detox for React Native apps, covering core flows on iOS and Android through real devices and emulators via BrowserStack or Sauce Labs. Mobile automation is scoped separately from web automation because the tooling, environment setup and maintenance overhead are different.

Maintenance is part of our ongoing retainer arrangements. When a UI change breaks a selector, we fix it. When a feature ships, we write and add new tests. When a flow is retired, its tests go with it. Coverage maps get updated each release cycle, and the contribution guide from handover means your own developers can write tests too, not just run the ones we left behind.

Yes. Coverage maps are produced during framework setup and updated with every suite expansion, showing which journeys are automated, which are manual-only, and which have no coverage at all. It gives your team an honest picture of QA posture instead of a pass rate that could be misleading if the suite only covers a fraction of the application.

Yes. Most clients move to an ongoing maintenance retainer after the initial build, covering suite updates as the application changes, flakiness resolution, coverage expansion and pipeline support. Retainers are scoped by release frequency and suite size, not billed by the hour. If you would rather maintain it in-house, we hand over full documentation and a contribution guide.